Lehigh Cement Edmonton CCUS Feasibility Study Project

Lehigh Cement


Project Type

Demonstration

Project Value

$2,710,000

Project Status

Completed

Location

Edmonton, AB

Funding Amount

$1,360,000

Developing the First Carbon Capture for the Cement Industry

The technology works by using a liquid solvent to chemically absorb CO2 from the flue gas produced during cement manufacturing, allowing the CO2 to be separated, compressed, and either stored underground or used for other purposes. What makes this application novel is its use in the cement sector; at the time, there were no large-scale commercial CO2 capture projects implemented in the cement sector. This is because in the cement industry, CO2 emissions come not only from fuel combustion but also from the calcination of limestone, making gas streams more difficult to treat than in other industries. The project focused on adapting this mature capture technology to the unique technical, spatial and thermal conditions of a cement facility, with the goal of advancing carbon capture deployment in industrial sectors that are difficult to decarbonize.

Identifying the Limitations and Feasibility of Carbon Capture

The feasibility study provided several important lessons about the technical and commercial viability of deploying carbon capture at a cement facility. One key insight was that amine-based post-combustion capture systems can be successfully adapted to handle the complex and variable flue gas streams produced in cement manufacturing, which include both process-related and combustion-related CO2. However, the study also highlighted the significant space, energy and infrastructure requirements involved in this system. Specifically, the system requires an extra steam boiler as there wasn’t enough usable waste heat from the cement plant for waste heat recovery. This resulted in higher projected operating costs than in industrial settings with better thermal integration. Another important takeaway was the need for careful site planning and utility integration, especially in urban or space-constrained facilities, to minimize construction risks and operational disruptions. From a commercial perspective, while the technology is technically feasible, its marketability remains dependent on supportive policy, carbon pricing and potential revenue from CO2 utilization or storage.

What’s next?